It was a long journey. I will start to work as a scientific staff at NRAO. I will continue posting my research to this diary.

## Interesting paper

•February 22, 2013 • Leave a CommentToday a very interesting paper focusing on discovery of relationship between complex astronomical data attributes in large dimensional space has been posted on astroph.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.5129

To find a coherent structure in large data volume, a clever machine learning technique is a must and this paper seems to be a very nice starting point.

## Marginal likelihood computation paper

•January 16, 2013 • Leave a CommentIn the last summer, we (Martin, Neal and I) have tested various methods to improve the accuracy of marginal likelihood for Bayes factor computation. What we’ve found then came out as a paper submitted to a journal and has been posted on astroph today (http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3156). The methods is simple but provides a remarkably accurate marginal likelihood value. It has been tested up to 16 dimensional space and put a solid foundation for GALPHAT galaxy model selection in the coming papers.

## ALFALFA+SDSS

•September 21, 2012 • Leave a CommentI became a postdoc and start to work on the ALFALFA+SDSS project. Jessica Rosenberg is building up a cross-correlated catalog from blind HI survey ALFALFA and SDSS. Main goal of this project is to study a role of gas in galactic star formation and galaxy evolution, using a large number of HI and optical sample. Today Jessica gave a talk and showed some of preliminary results from the ALFALFA+SDSS. Although it was interesting to see that the gas-to-star ratio for galaxy pair is less than that for the entire ALFALFA+SDSS sample on average, a careful investigation of the sample selection function should be done for a reliable inference.

## GALPHAT paper errata (not in the source code)

•April 9, 2012 • Leave a CommentI’ve found a minor typo error in GALPHAT paper (2011, MNRAS 414, 1625).

In equation (7), “k = 0.01945-0.8902n + 10.95n*n – 19.67*n*n + 13.43*n*n*n” should be “k = 0.01945-0.8902n + 10.95n*n – 19.67*n*n*n + 13.43*n*n*n*n”. The code is safe from this typo.

## 15 min summary of cosmic evolution

•March 30, 2012 • Leave a CommentSean Carroll speaks very clearly and concisely about a modern view of our Universe. Worth to spent 15 min

## Radial distribution of galaxies in cluster

•March 28, 2012 • Leave a CommentAs a continuing work based on the heat bath paper that I published, I am working on a simple toy model of self-gravitating system at the centre of a deep gravitational potential well, which behaves as a thermal heat bath and increases a velocity dispersion of the embedded system. Then this system is not bound by the system’s self-gravity but bound by the surrounding external potential well. I derived an equilibrium density profile of the system and compared to the Coma cluster galaxy radial distribution. Based on a ‘chi^2 by eye’, it gives an equally good fit to the data as King model does. However this self-gravitating system surrounded by a deep potential well is more realistic description of the cluster galaxies than King model. I am preparing a paper to introduce the new model with some theoretical backgrounds and observational applications.

## Comments